Photo by gabrielabertolini/iStock / Getty Images
Since we're near the end of the Holy Week, I thought to share my reflections on the Good Friday, with a special focus on Judas and the controversial topic of suicide.
Recently, we have witnessed a tendency of rehabilitating Judas' suicide, and suicide in general, by some contemporary theologians. Among them, you can find even Vatican's officials, including Pope Francis, who controversially stated: “How did Judas end up? I don’t know.”
Through the analysis of this topic, I see the necessity of saying a few words on the nature of sin, hope, and mercy.
In our secularized era, the aforementioned concepts might sound as outdated or even meaningless. So, we should start by questioning the definition of sin. According to the Compendium of the Catholic Catechism, sin is defined as the deliberate action which separates one from God. So basically, sin is a 'sui generis' apostasy, and understanding the pain of despair, our weak human nature, it is natural to show a kind of compassion. Because at a certain moment of our lives, we have been like Judas; and all of us seek for [God's] mercy. But can we agree with the rehabilitation of it? What would be its effect on the faithful? Would this mean watering down the faith? Or even a total misleading thought, heresy!?
There's no need of repeating it, the story of Judas is familiar to each of us. He betrayed Christ for 30 silver coins, gave him a false kiss, later after realizing what he had done, he felt in despair and committed suicide. With righteousness, his name has become synonymous with betrayal.
But as Pope Benedict XVI wrote in his magnum opus, Jesus of Nazareth: Holy Week, Judas' greatest sin was falling into despair. That was the stubborn refusal of seeing the light of hope, forgiveness, Christ. That's why he chose the other way: suicide. This is a fact which shouldn't be ignored.
The very opposite of Judas is Simon Peter, the man who not only repent but accepted his weakness; dared to believe and hope of forgiveness, despite his heavy sin of "apostasy“. The best explanation of the Catholic understanding of it, I believe, has shown us the Pope emeritus in his encyclical Spe Salvi: "The one who has hope lives differently; the one who hopes has been granted the gift of a new life." This is an essential thing which we should not forget. Faith in Christ, despite the burden of pain, gives us hope in forgiveness and redemption. Suffering while having hope is what makes us Christians. In the end, as Pope Ratzinger says, that suffering is the only way of to the true conversion.
Therefore, despite the secular critiques, it's quite understandable why the Church has traditionally considered suicide as a mortal sin and should maintain as such. It does not matter what liberal theologians say, it's Biblical – "Thou shall not kill!"
Going through the darkness is difficult, but by absolving [Judas] suicide in the name of the 'mercy', we jeopardize the very essence of Christianity. Such action at the end leads to corrupting the original meaning of mercy. This is the serious problem of the postmodern understanding of mercy, because it defines it in an indifferent way, without the necessity of faith or hope, only for the sake of emotive “niceness”. But without hope, it's impossible to expect mercy, because in the Christian sense, giving up hope is equal to apostasy, it means refusing Christ as saviour, his cross and his glorious light: resurrection! That’s why charity can be found only in the Truth.