When Joe Biden was elected as President, we published the following:
With news that 25,000 troops have rolled in to Washington DC to stop their own people from protesting this week’s events, perhaps Americans are finally realising that if the Globalists who run their country could send their own troops to die for a pointless war in such huge numbers, then there is no domestic behaviour that they would regard as too authoritarian or too heavy handed. They have already turned these tools on their own people, with TSA flight restriction protocols and the Patriot Act post 9/11. Authorities water boarded and tortured innocent people, distributed images of brutal abuse of people in Abu Ghraib prison, it is hard to imagine them drawing a distinction between other people and their own if they don’t draw a distinction between innocent and guilty.
To now watch this same military then be used to brazenly lead the installation of a new regime is surreal, but only if you regard us in the West as untouchable from the repercussions of the monsters that we have created and tolerated.
Like the people of Baghdad in 2003, we all seem to be counting our breaths until the Globalists arrive looking for us.
Fast forward to 2023 and we have seen the jailing of priests like Father Fidelis Mocsinski CFR, the widespread arson and vandalism attacks on churches in the USA and Canada as well as the worst of all, the FBI’s investigation into Catholics.
The US House Judiciary Committee heard this week that there was no truth to the claim by the FBI’s that the leaked memo from last year was some sort of rogue office going on a solo run, as claimed by FBI Director Christ Wray.
The note in question had named Tradition in Action, The Remnant, Culture Wars Magazine, the Fatima Crusader, the FSSP and the SSPX and others as potential terror threats and enemies of state.
The document wrote:
The current trend of [racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist] interest in [radical-traditionalist Catholic ideology] provides new opportunities to mitigate the [racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist] threat through outreach to traditionalist Catholic parishes and the development of sources with the placement and access to report on [racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists] seeking to use [radical-traditionalist Catholic ideology] social media sites or places of worship as facilitation platforms to promote violence
The situation is a very serious one, one that Catholics should consider at the next election and surely when Joe Biden is honoured at Marian Shrines such as Knock.
You can read the Committee’s letter here:
Dear Director Wray:
The Committee on the Judiciary is continuing to conduct oversight of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) assessment of traditional Catholics as potential domestic terrorists. From information recently produced to the Committee, we now know that the FBI relied on information from around the country—including a liaison contact in the FBI’s Portland Field Office and reporting from the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office—to develop its assessment.
This new information suggests that the FBI’s use of its law enforcement capabilities to intrude on American’s First Amendment rights is more widespread than initially suspected and reveals inconsistencies with your previous testimony before the Committee. Given this startling new information, we write to request additional information to advance our oversight. For months, we have sought information relating to the FBI’s document generated by the Richmond Field Office, dated January 23, 2023, and entitled, “Interest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical-Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities.”
On April 10, as a result of the FBI’s failure to voluntarily comply with our request, the Committee issued a subpoena relating to this document.
On July 17, 2023, we wrote to you noting that if the FBI failed to “substantially improve its compliance” with the subpoena, the Committee may seek to enforce the subpoena through contempt proceedings. 4 1 Letter from Christopher Dunham, Acting Asst. Dir., Fed. Bureau of Investigation, to Rep. Jim Jordan, Chairman, H. Comm. on the Judiciary (July 25, 2023).
Fed. Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Domain Perspective, Interest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical-Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities (Jan. 23, 2023).
Subpoena from Rep. Jim Jordan, Chairman, H. Comm. on the Judiciary, to Hon. Christopher A. Wray, Dir., Fed. Bureau of Investigation (Apr. 10, 2023).
Letter from Rep. Jim Jordan, Chairman, H. Comm. on the Judiciary, to Hon. Christopher A. Wray, Dir., Fed. Bureau of Investigation (July 17, 2023) The Honorable Christopher A. Wray August 9, 2023 Page 2 On July 25, 2023, the FBI produced a version of the Richmond document with fewer redactions than the two previous versions it had produced.
This new version shows that the FBI’s actions were not just limited to “a single field office,” as you testified to the Committee.
The document cited reporting from an “FBI Portland liaison contact with indirect access” who informed on a “deceased [Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist (RMVE)] subject” who had “sought out a mainline Roman Catholic community” and then “gravitated to [Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX)].”
In addition, the document noted how an FBI undercover employee with “direct access” reported on a subject who “attended the SSPX-affiliated [redacted] Church in [redacted] California, for over a year prior to his relocation.”
The document states that FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office initiated an investigation on the “RMVE subject.”
Most concerning of all the newly produced version of the document explicitly states that FBI Richmond “[c]oordinated with” FBI Portland in preparing the assessment.
Thus, it appears that both FBI Portland and FBI Los Angeles field offices were involved in or contributed to the creation of FBI’s assessment of traditional Catholics as potential domestic terrorists. This revelation raises the question of why you redacted this information in previous versions of the document you produced to the Committee, and it reinforces the Committee’s need for all FBI material responsive to the April 10 subpoena, including the production of FBI’s Richmond document without redactions.
We look forward to receiving a briefing on the FBI’s internal review of this matter and to interviewing the Special Agent in Charge of the Richmond Field Office. However, we again reiterate our outstanding requests, including our request to conduct a transcribed interview with the Chief Division Counsel who approved the Richmond document. We wrote to you on July 18 inviting you to correct the testimony you provided on July 12 related to the FBI’s role in the censorship of American speech. This new information raises additional concerns about the accuracy, completeness, and truthfulness of your testimony. We invite you to amend your testimony to fully explain the nature and scope of the FBI’s assessment of traditional Catholics as potential domestic terrorists.
If Catholics are willing to to stand aside while they are called terrorists, then they must prepare for what comes next.
